![]() ![]() Sure, AHP lacked the color and wide-screen glamor of Hitchcock’s theatrical releases, but it brought the same cheeky attitude he was famous for to more modest tales of greed, obsession, and homicide. Hitchcock’s name on a movie meant long lines at the box office, so they banked on his name on a weekly TV show translating into people tuning him in at home. CBS was willing to take a gamble on Alfred Hitchcock Presents because the portly director’s fame would draw in curious viewers who had eagerly flocked to such thrillers as “Notorious”, “Strangers on a Train”, and “Rear Window”. That calls for a lot of trust on the part of the audience. Every episode brings a totally new cast and setup. They prefer to hook viewers with a strong situation and memorable characters - ones the audience can be sure will be there week after week. The networks have never been crazy about putting anthologies on the air. That’s really saying something, by the way. So it’s hardly surprising that they were behind the two most successful anthologies in the history of television. If anything, the intervening years have deepened my appreciation for their work. It’s hard to beat Rod Serling and Alfred Hitchcock. But you know what? My top answers are still the same today. If I were to list all of my favorites now, it would take a while. I’ve seen the work of many more directors since then, and quite a few more TV series. ![]() If you’d asked me to name my favorite director, I’d have said the man behind Alfred Hitchcock Presents. If you’d asked me when I was a teenager to name my favorite TV series, I’d have said The Twilight Zone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |